Russell's Paradox: A Historical Study about the Paradox in Frege's Theories

Authors

  • Aline Germano Fonseca Coury alinee_fonseca@hotmail.com
    Departamento de Educação – PPGE - UFScar – São Carlos - Brasil
  • Denise Silva Vilela denisevilela@ufscar.br
    Departamento de Metodologia de Ensino – DME - UFScar – São Carlos - Brasil

DOI:

10.47976/RBHM2019v19n3795-116

Keywords:

Mathematics, History, Russell’s Paradox, Gottlob Frege

Abstract

For over twenty years, Frege tried to find the foundations of arithmetic through logic, and by doing this, he attempted to establish the truth and certainty of the knowledge. However, when he believed his work was done, Bertrand Russell sent him a letter pointing out a paradox, known as Russell’s paradox. It is often considered that Russell identified the paradox in Frege’s theories. However, as shown in this paper, Russell, Frege and also George Cantor contributed significantly to the identification of the paradox. In 1902, Russell encouraged Frege to reconsider a portion of his work based in a paradox built from Cantor’s theories. Previously, in 1885, Cantor had warned Frege about taking extensions of concepts in the construction of his system. With these considerations, Frege managed to identify the precise law and definitions that allowed the generation of the paradox in his system. The objective of this paper is to present a historical reconstruction of the paradox in Frege’s publications and discuss it considering the correspondences exchanged between him and Russell. We shall take special attention to the role played by each of these mathematicians in the identification of the paradox and its developments. We also will show how Frege anticipated the solutions and new theories that would arise when dealing with logico-mathematical paradoxes, including but not limited to Russell’s paradox.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

FREGE, G. 1960. The Foundations of Arithmetic: a logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number. J. L. Austin (Trans.). New York: Harper & Brothers.

FURTH, M. 1964. Introduction. In M. Furth (Ed.) The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: exposition of the system. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

GOLDSTEIN, R. 2008. Incompletude: a prova e o paradoxo de Kurt Gödel. I. Korytowski (Trans.) São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Published

2020-10-16

Métricas


Visualizações do artigo: 359     PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 243

How to Cite

COURY, Aline Germano Fonseca; VILELA, Denise Silva. Russell’s Paradox: A Historical Study about the Paradox in Frege’s Theories. Brazilian Journal on the History of Mathematics, São Paulo, vol. 19, no. 37, p. 95–116, 2020. DOI: 10.47976/RBHM2019v19n3795-116. Disponível em: https://rbhm.org.br/index.php/RBHM/article/view/14. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos